According to @jih2nn, FOCIL would add protocol-level censorship resistance that underpins Ethereum’s credible neutrality, and delaying its shipment would make integration harder, source: @jih2nn on X, Nov 11 2025. According to @jih2nn, adding FOCIL to the Glamsterdam fork increases complexity and would delay the fork, repeating Pectra cadence issues and creating timing risk for ETH upgrade expectations, source: @jih2nn on X, Nov 11 2025. According to @jih2nn, combining ePBS with FOCIL is more complex than delivering 6s with FOCIL, and FOCIL is lower priority than other scaling features, signaling potential scope pressure for Glamsterdam, source: @jih2nn on X, Nov 11 2025. According to @jih2nn, the community has strongly signaled preference for FOCIL and contributors are advancing it bottom up, indicating continued momentum regardless of cadence debates, source: @jih2nn on X, Nov 11 2025. According to @jih2nn, he supports shipping FOCIL in Glamsterdam and warns that deferring to a later H* fork is uncertain, which traders can read as roadmap feature-set uncertainty, source: @jih2nn on X, Nov 11 2025. According to @jih2nn, stakeholders are invited to comment via the Ethereum PM issue and the Ethereum Magicians thread, making these key venues to track timeline and scope decisions for ETH, source: github.com/ethereum/pm/issues/1793#issuecomment-3501249470 and ethereum-magicians.org/t/community-feedback-on-non-headlining-features-in-glamsterdam/26410.